I will caveat this post by saying that I am by no means a Polaroid Multiple Exposure expert, but I dabble. There are others on the 'net that are much more into Polaroid cameras and all the good and interesting things that the cameras do. There is a chap called Will Malone who has made multiple exposures a real art form and tried, with some success, to formalise this with some science. It is this kind of geekery that really interests me.
I am not going to reproduce the formalisation here, but, as we all stand on the shoulders of giants, I shall, and have been, be using his work as inspiration for my own.
A multiple exposure is, as I'm sure you will know, the practice of making two or more exposures within one frame and the result will be two pictures (if you take two exposures), somehow mixed together by the universe in a way that is not entirely predictable. The result is random, chaotic even, but wholly unpredictable.
This photo, for example, shows two pictures that have blended in a way that relies on the unpredictability of the film, the camera and the scenery.
Now it is possible to reduce chaos, impose some structure or form and end up with something reasonably intentional.
This was created (Ha Ha!) by taking the first exposure normally then turning the camera through 180 degrees and taking the second image of the same subject as the first. This technique introduces symmetry, while retaining a level of randomness that is pleasing to the eye. Or at least my eye.
This picture was created using a technique of taking an exposure of something in shadow (here the tree) and then the second exposure will appear to be bounded in the trees form. It's weird and random but pleasing nonetheless.
On balance the multiple exposure offers much for the creative photographer. The ability to experiment, see the results "on site" and able to try again if needed really does make for an enjoyable experience.
And after all that is what it's all about, experience.
Love these Andy
ReplyDeleteThanks Dave
ReplyDelete